People Management

Hiring, onboarding, and comp philosophy — the operational side of having people, not just a team.

1

Hiring

What actually falls on the hiring manager, separate from whatever recruiting owns.

1

Define the real role — not a copy-paste of the last job description. What does this person need to be able to do in the first six months, not the eventual dream version of the role.

2

Design the loop — the same questions for every candidate, scored against the same rubric, by interviewers calibrated on what a passing answer looks like before the loop starts.

3

Make the call — one clear decision-maker, not a committee vote diluted into nobody actually owning it. Debrief while the signal is still fresh.

4

Close the loop — candid with the person you hire about what they're walking into, and respectful of the ones you pass on. Both outcomes still reflect on you.

2

The First 90 Days

Onboarding runs on its own short cadence, separate from Goal Setting's Year/Quarter/Month rhythm — until day 90, when it folds back into it.

Day 30

Learn the role and the team. No big swings yet — clear on what's expected, who's who, and how work actually moves here.

Day 60

First real contribution lands. An early read on how they operate — a data point, not a verdict.

Day 90

Full ramp. Running at the same bar as the rest of the team, which is where onboarding ends and Goal Setting's regular cadence picks up.

3

Comp Philosophy

What a leader needs to understand and be able to say out loud, without over-promising what isn't theirs to promise.

1

Know the band before the conversation — you can't speak credibly about someone's pay if you don't already know where they sit in the range and where the ceiling actually is.

2

Separate pay-for-performance from a market correction — a raise for doing great work and a raise for being underpaid relative to the market are two different conversations. Conflating them makes neither one land clearly.

3

Say what you can't change — out loud. If budget or banding ties your hands, saying so plainly earns more trust than a vague non-answer that reads as evasive.

4

Advocate in the room they're not in — calibration and comp planning happen without the employee present. That's where a leader earns or loses credibility with their own team.

Watch-out

The fastest way to erode trust across People Management is inconsistency — two people doing comparable work, hired or paid differently, with no explainable reason. If you can't explain a decision to the person it affects, that's a sign to fix the decision, not just the explanation.

Try It

Paste this into ChatGPT, Claude, or whatever AI tool you use:

Help me design a calibrated interview loop for a role I'm hiring. Ask me what this person needs to be able to do in their first six months, then help me turn that into a small set of structured questions, each with a clear rubric for what a passing answer looks like. Push back if a question is too open-ended to score consistently across candidates, or if the loop is testing something that doesn't actually matter for the first six months.