References & Further Reading › One-page summary

Cover of Power & Impact

One-page summary · 1 min read

Power & Impact

Emotional Intelligence

by Harvard Business Review

2019 · 1h 58m audiobook · ★ 4.2 Audible

The big idea

Power at work is inevitable and can be wielded well or badly; this collection examines how to build influence ethically, avoid being corrupted by power, and use it to lift others rather than just yourself.

Power Styles Self-Assessment
One article frames power as coming from different sources, formal authority, expertise, relationships, or reputation, and asks readers to identify their own dominant power style to see both its natural leverage and its blind spots. A leader who relies mainly on formal authority, for example, may need to deliberately build relational or expert power to influence people outside their direct chain of command.

Power style is this collection's reflective framing, not a single validated psychometric instrument, treat it as a discussion tool rather than a scored test.

Key ideas

  1. Power corrupts unless checked

    Power tends to erode empathy and self-monitoring, so leaders need deliberate checks.

  2. Power styles vary

    People draw influence from different sources, authority, expertise, relationships, reputation, and should know which one they lean on.

  3. Leaders leak power in avoidable ways

    Habits like over-apologizing, hedging, or not taking credit quietly erode influence over time.

  4. Shared power multiplies impact

    Giving a team real authority and visible credit boosts collective performance more than hoarding control.

Try it this week

  1. Identify your dominant power source and deliberately draw on a different one this week.
  2. In your next team meeting, delegate one piece of real decision-making authority, not just a task.

Is it for you?

Best for

  • Leaders who already hold formal authority and want to use it more ethically
  • Managers concerned about becoming, or working for, a power-corrupted boss

Less useful if

  • Readers wanting a single sustained argument rather than a curated article set with varied authors and tones
  • Early-career readers with little positional power yet may find some pieces less directly applicable